Not From Where You're Sitting

From the classroom

Initiative Fatigue: Why Constant Change Wears Out Good Teachers

New program, new acronym, new PD day. What initiative fatigue costs teachers and students, and what patient, lasting school reform looks like.

There's a particular look teachers get when a new initiative is announced at a staff meeting. It's not quite an eye-roll. It's more like a quiet, weary nod. A look that says, "Here we go again."

If you're not a teacher, that look might seem cynical. Shouldn't teachers be excited about new ideas? Isn't improvement the whole point?

We are excited about improvement. That's exactly why the look exists. Because many of us have seen good ideas come and go before they had a chance to work. We've learnt new acronyms, attended training, changed our planning, and then watched the whole thing quietly replaced by the next big thing.

This article is about initiative fatigue: what it is, why it happens and what it costs.

The new thing

In my experience, there's usually a new thing.

A new framework for teaching reading. A new approach to behaviour. A new wellbeing program. A new assessment tool. A new planning template. A new software platform. A new set of priorities for the year, with a new name and a new logo.

Some of these come from governments or departments. Some come from school leadership. Some come from research, some from trends, some from a conference someone went to. Many of them are genuinely good ideas.

The problem isn't any single new thing. It's the pace and the pile-up.

Why change takes time

Here's something every gardener knows: you can't plant a tree and dig it up every few months to check if it's growing. Roots need time.

Teaching practice is the same. When teachers learn a new approach, the first attempts are often clumsy. It takes time to understand the idea deeply, adapt it to your students, iron out the problems and make it feel natural. It might take a term, a year or longer before an approach is really working well.

If the initiative is replaced before that happens, all that early effort is lost. Worse, it can look like the idea "didn't work," when really it was never given a fair chance.

And when this happens repeatedly, teachers learn a lesson that nobody intended to teach: don't invest too much in the new thing, because it won't last.

The hidden cost of change

Every change has a cost that rarely shows up in planning documents.

There's the time to learn the new approach: training days, readings, meetings. There's the time to rewrite plans, units and resources to fit the new model. There's the mental load of holding the new way of doing things in your head while also remembering the old requirements that haven't quite gone away.

And there's an emotional cost. Teachers care deeply about doing a good job. When the definition of "a good job" keeps changing, it can leave people feeling like they're never quite getting it right. That's exhausting.

Layers, not replacements

One of the things that makes initiative fatigue worse is that new things are often added on top of old ones, rather than replacing them.

The new reading approach arrives, but the old reporting requirement is still there. The new wellbeing program starts, but last year's program is still technically running. The new planning template is introduced, but some people still want the old one too.

Over time, teachers end up juggling multiple overlapping systems, each with its own expectations. It's like trying to follow three different recipes for the same cake at once.

Why it keeps happening

I don't think initiative fatigue happens because anyone wants to make teachers' lives harder. From where I sit, it seems to come from a few understandable pressures.

Leaders and governments want to show they're doing something. A new initiative is visible and announceable. Patiently sticking with an existing approach for five years is harder to put in a press release.

People move on. A new minister, a new department head, a new principal often brings new priorities. That's natural. But it means the long, slow work of embedding change keeps getting interrupted.

There's also genuine enthusiasm. Someone discovers an approach that seems really promising and wants to bring it to schools as quickly as possible. That's coming from a good place. But speed isn't always the friend of good change.

What teachers lose

When initiatives come too fast, teachers lose more than time.

We lose confidence that our effort will be valued. We lose the chance to really master an approach. We lose trust in the process. And we can lose some of the spark that makes teaching exciting, because new ideas start to feel like extra burdens rather than opportunities.

Students lose too. They experience the churn as constantly changing routines, expectations and language. A student who learns one way of approaching a problem one year and a completely different way the next can end up confused about both.

What good change looks like

I've also seen change done well, and it tends to have some things in common.

A plea for patience

If I could say one thing to anyone planning the next big education initiative, it would be: please be patient.

Choose fewer things. Do them properly. Stick with them long enough to know if they work. Ask teachers what's already on their plate before adding more. And when something isn't working, talk to the people in classrooms before deciding it's the idea's fault.

Teachers aren't resistant to change. We change constantly. We adapt every lesson, every day, to the students in front of us. What wears us down is change without purpose, change without time, and change without end.

Getting the spark back

I'll finish this article on a hopeful note. When a good idea arrives, teachers are given the time and support to make it work, and it's allowed to stick around, something wonderful happens. Teachers get excited again. They share what's working. They build on it. The idea grows roots.

That's the kind of change that actually improves schools. It's slower. It's less flashy. It doesn't always make headlines. But it lasts.

And lasting change, done with teachers rather than to them, is exactly what our students deserve.

Next: Behaviour, Wellbeing and the Things Kids Carry Into the Classroom